اثر استفاده‌ی کنجاله کلزا به جای کنجاله سویا بر کیفیت گوشت، مورفولوژی و جمعیت میکروبی ایلئوم در بلدرچین ژاپنی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران

4 استادیار، گروه پاتوبیولوژی، دانشکده دامپزشکی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران

10.22034/nfvm.2023.396116.1186

چکیده

آزمایشی به‌منظور بررسی اثرات استفاده‌ی کنجاله کلزا به جای کنجاله سویا بر کیفیت گوشت، مورفولوژی و جمعیت میکروبی ایلئوم در بلدرچین با تعداد 675 قطعه بلدرچین ژاپنی در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با 9 تیمار، 5 تکرار و هر تکرار با 15 قطعه بلدرچین انجام شد. تیمارها شامل شاهد: جیره پایه ذرت و کنجاله سویا، کنجاله کلزا جایگزین 25، 50، 75 و 100 درصد با کنجاله سویا و همان تیمارها با افزودن پروبیوتیک پروتکسین (200 میلی‌گرم در کیلوگرم) در جیره غذایی بودند که در سن 7 تا 35 روزگی مورد استفاده قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد تیمارها بر اسیدیته گوشت بلدرچین و افت خون‌آبه آن تأثیری نداشتند و کنجاله کلزای بدون پروبیوتیک تأثیری بر کیفیت گوشت بلدرچین نداشت (05/0<P). تیمار 25 درصد کنجاله کلزا با پروبیوتیک در مقایسه با سایر تیمارها بیشترین ظرفیت نگهداری آب، کمترین مقدار افت پخت، و بیشترین میزان شمارش لاکتوباسیل را داشت (05/0>P). همچنین تیمارهای شاهد و 25 درصد کلزا با پروبیوتیک کمترین میزان مالون‌دی‌آلدئید و تیمارهای 25 و 50 درصد کلزا با پروبیوتیک کمترین میزان شمارش باکتری اشریشیاکلی را داشتند (05/0>P). همچنین تیمار 25 درصد کنجاله کلزا همرا با پروبیوتیک بیشترین طول پرز روده و کمترین میزان عمق کریپت را در مقایسه با سایر تیمارها داشت (05/0>P). نتایج در این مطالعه نشان داد که با توجه به اثرات مثبت جایگزینی 25 درصد کنجاله کلزا با کنجاله سویا و استفاده از پروبیوتیک پروتکسین بر کیفیت گوشت، مورفولوژی و جمعیت میکروبی ایلئوم بلدرچین ژاپنی می‌توان از این منبع پروتئینی قابل دسترس در جیره بلدرچین ژاپنی استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of rapeseed meal instead of soybean meal on meat quality, morphology and ileum microbial population in Japanese quail

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahdi Rashki 1
  • Ghasem Jalilvand 2
  • Farzad Bagherzadeh kasmani 2
  • Mahmoud Ghazaghi 3
  • Aida Davari 4
1 Ph.D. students, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol Uinversity, Zabol, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol Uinversity, Zabol, Iran
3 Assistant professor, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol Uinversity, Zabol, Iran
4 Assistant professor, Faculty of Veterinary, Zabol Uinversity, Zabol, Iran
چکیده [English]

This study investigated the effects of using rapeseed meal instead of soybean meal on meat quality, morphology, and ileum microbial population in Japanese quail using 675 Japanese quail in a completely randomized design with 9 treatments, 5 repetitions, and 15 quail per repetition. The treatments consisted of a control group fed with a corn and soybean meal-based diet without additives, as well as rapeseed meal replacing soybean meal at 25, 50, 75, and 100 percent both with and without protoxin probiotic (200 mg/kg) supplementation diets from 7 to 35 days of ages. Treatments without probiotics had no effect on quail meat pH and percentage of loss due to cooking and the rapeseed meal without probiotic had no effect on meat quality of quail (P>0.05). The treatment fed with the control treatment and the 25% rapeseed meal treatment with probiotics had the highest percentage of water retention capacity, lover loss due to cooking and higher amount of lactobacillus counted(P<0.05). The control treatments and 25% rapeseed meal had lover amount of malondialdehyde and 25, 50 % rapeseed meal treatments with probiotic had lover Escherichia coli count (P<0.05). Also 25% rapeseed meal with probiotic treatment increase villi height and decerse crypt depth compare with other treatments(P<0.05). In conclusion, this study suggests that inclusion of 25 % rapeseed meal instead of soybean meal with probiotic supplementation can positively affect meat quality, morphology, and microbial population in the ileum of Japanese quail we can use this available protein meal in the Japanese quail ration.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Japanese quail
  • Protoxin probiotic
  • Soybean meal
  • Rapeseed meal

مراجع

1- Costa C.C, Goulart D.F, Figueiredo C.F, Oliveira S, Silva J.H.V. Economic and environmental impact of using exogenous enzymes on poultry feeding. International Journal of Poultry Science.2008; 7: 311-314.
2- Patterson J.A, Burkholder K.M. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science. 2003; 82: 627-631.
3- Marteau P, Pochart P, Bouhnik Y, Rambaud J.C. Fate and effects of some transiting microorganisms in the human gastrointestinal tract. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics. 1993; 74: 1–21.
4- Salminen S, Deighton M.A, Benno Y, Gorbach S.L. Lactic acid bacteria in health anddisease. In: Lactic acid bacteria: microbiology and functional aspects (Ed. by S. Salminen and A. von Wright). 1998; pp. 211-253.
5- Muir W.I, Bryden W.L, Husband A.J. Immunity, vaccination and the avian intestinal tract. Developmental and Comparative Immunology. 2000; 24: 325–342.
6- Pur M.M, Alishahi M, Ghotbeddin N. Effects of dietary probiotic, Lactobacillus casei on some hematological and immunological parameters in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fingerlings.  International Journal of Biosciences. 2015; 6(7): 29–33.
7- Fuller, R. probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1989; 66: 365-378.
8- Green A.A, Sainsbury D.W.B. The role of probiotic in producing quality products. XV European symposium on the quality of poultry meat 9-12 September. 2001; kusadasi/Turkey, pp: 245-251.
9- Honma N, Ohtani K, Kikuchi H. On effect of lactic acid bacteria. part.II. clinical effect. New. Med. Clin. 1987; 36: 75.
10- Middilli M, Tuncer S.D. The effect of enzyme and probiotic supplementation to diets on broiler performance. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Science. 2001; 895-903.
11- Mohan B, Kadirvel R, Natarajan A, Bhaskaran M. Effect of probiotic supplementation on growth, nitrogen utilization and serum cholesterol in broiler. British Poultry Science. 1996; 37: 395-401.
12- Yeo J, kim K.I. Effect of feeding diets containing an antibiotic, a probiotic or yucca extract on growth and intestinal urease activity in broiler chicks. Journal of Poultry Science. 1997;76: 381-385.
13- Langout P. New additives for broiler chickens. Feed Mix. 2000; pp: 24-27.
14- Renuka K.P, Venkateshwarlu M, Ramachandra Naik A.T. Effect of probiotic (Lactobacillus acidophilus) on hematological parameters of Catla catla. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2014; 3(8): 326–335.
15- Hashemipour H, Khaksar V, Kermanshahi H. Application of probiotic on egg production and egg quality of chukar partridge. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011; 10: 19244-19248. [In Persian]
16- Khosravi A, Boldaji F, Dastar B, Hassani S. The use of some feed additives as growth promoters in broilers nutrition. International Journal of Poultry Science. 2008; 7:1095-1099. [In Persian]
17- National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Revised Edition, National Academy Press. 1994; Washington, D C.
18- Mehri M, Sabaghi V, Bagherzadeh- Kasmani F. Mentha piperita (peppermint) in growing Japanese quails diet: Serum biochemistry, meat quality, humoral immunity. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2015; 206: 57-66.
19- Guban J, Korver D.R, Allison G.E, Tan-nock G.W. Relationship of dietary antimicrobialdrug administration with broiler performance, de- creased population levels of Lactobacillus salivar- ius, and reduced bile salt deconjugation in the ileum of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2006; 85: 2186-2194.
20- SAS. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. 9.1 Edition. 2004, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.
21- Mohammed A.A, Zaki R.S, Negm E.A, Mahmoud M.A, Cheng H.W. Effects of dietary supplementation of a probiotic (Bacillus subtilis) on bone mass and meat quality of broiler chickens. Poultry seince.2021; 100(3): 1-11.
22- Saenmahayak B, Singh M, Bilgili S.F, Hess J.B. Influence of dietary supplementation with complexed zinc on meat quality and shelf life of broilers. International journal of poultry science. 2012; 11(1): 28-32.
23- Briskey E.J, Wismer-Pedersn J. Biochemistry of pork muscle structure. Rate of anaerobic glycolysis and temperature change versus the apparent structure of muscle tissue. Journal of Food Science .1962; 26: 297-395.
24- Mushtaq T, Sarwar M, Ahmad G, Mirza M.A, Nawaz H, Mushtaq M.M, et al. Influence of canola meal-based diets supplemented with exogenous enzyme and digestible lysine on performance, digestibility, carcass, and immune responses of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2007; 86: 2144-2151. [In Persian]
25- Awad W.A, Ghareeb K, Abdel-Raheem S, Böhm J. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2009; 88: 49–55.
26- Chiang G, Lu W.Q, Piao X.S, Hu J.K, Gong L.M, Thacker P.A. Effects of feeding solid-state fermented rapeseed meal on performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal ecology and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2009; 23(2): 263-271.
27- Montanhini Neto R, Ceccantini M.L, Fernandes J.I.M. Immune response of broilers fed conventional and alternative diets containing multi-enzyme complex. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 2013; 15: 223-231.
28- Elbaz A.M, El-Sheikh S.E, Abdel‑Maksoud A. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, antioxidant state, ileal histomorphometry, and cecal ecology of broilers fed on fermented canola meal with and without exogenous enzymes. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2023; 55(1): 46-57.
29- Windisch W, Schedle K, Plitzner Kroismayr A. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. Animal Science. 2008; 86: l40-l48.
30- Zhang A.W, Lee B.D, Lee S.K, Lee K.W, An G.H, Song K.B, et al. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell components on growth performance, meat quality and ileal mucosa development of broiler chicks. Poultry Science. 2005; 84: 1015-1021.
31- Baurhoo B, Letellier A, Zhao X, Ruiz-Feria C.A. Cecal populations of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria and Escherichia coli after in vivo Escherichia coli challenge in birds fed diets with purified lignin or mannanoligo-saccharides. Poultry Science. 2007; 86: 2509-2516.
32- Awad, W.A, Bohm J, Razzazi-Fazeli E, Ghareeb K, Ze-ntek J. Effect of addition of a probiotic micro organism to broiler diets contaminated with deoxyniva-lenol on performance and histological alterations of intes-tinal villi of broiler chickens. Poultry Science.2006; 85: 974-979.
33- Samli H.E, Senkoylu N, Koc F, Kanter M, Agma A. Effects of Enterococcus faecium and dried whey on broiler performance, gut histomorphology and microbiota. Archives of Animal Nutrition. 2007; 61: 42-49.
34- Houshmand M, Azhar K, Zulkifli I, Bejo M.H, Meiman-dipour A, Kamyab A. Effects of non-antibiotic feed additives on performance, tibial dyschondroplasia inci-dence and tibia characteristics of broilers fed low calcium diets. Poultry Science. 2012; 91: 393-401.
35- KhodambashiEmami N, Samie A, Rahmani H.R, Ruiz-Feria C.A. The effect of peppermint essential oil and fructooligosaccharides, as alternatives to virginiamycin, on growth performance, digestibility, gut morphology and immune response of male broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2012; 175: 57-64.
36- Jin L.Z, Abdullah Y, Jalaludin S. Growth performance, intestinal microbial populations, and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing lactobacillus cultures. Poultry Science. 1998; 7: 1259-1265.
37- Pelicano E.R.L, Souza P.A, Souza, H.B.A. Intestinal mucosa development in broiler chicken fed natural growth promoters. Rev. Brasil. Cie.Avic. 2005; 7: 287-94.
38- Samanya M, Yamauchi K. Histological alterations of intestinal villi in chickens fed dried bacillus subtilis var. natto. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2002; Part A. 133: 95–104.
39- Chichlowski M.W.J, Croom F.W, Edens R, MacBride C, Qiu L.R, Chiang R, et al. Microarchitecture and spatial relationship between bacteria and ileal, cecal and colonic epithelium in chicks fed a direct-fed microbial, Primalac and salinomycin. Poultry Science. 2007; 86: 1121-1132.
40- Gunal M, Yayli G, Kara O, Karahan N, Sulak O. The effect of antibiotic growth promoter, probiotic or organic acid supplementation on performance, intestinal microflora and tissue of broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science. 2006; 5: 149-155.
41- Taheri H.R, Moravej H, Malakzadegan A, Tabandeh F, Zaghari M, Shivazad M, et al. Efficacy of Pedicoccus acid lactici-based probiotic on intestinal Coliforms and villus height, serum cholesterol level and performance of broiler chickens. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2010; 9: 7564-7567. [In Persian]
42- Shamoto K, Yamauchi K. Recovery responses of chick intestinal villus morphology to different feeding procedures. Poultry Science. 2000; 79: 718–723.
43- Pluske J.R, Tompson M.J, Atwood C.S, Bird P.H, Williams I.H, Hartmann P.E. Maintenance of villus height and crypt depth and enhancement of disaccharide digestion and monosaccharide absorption, in piglets fed on cows’ whole milk after weaning. British Journal Nutrition. 1996; 76: 409–422.
44- Taherpour K, Moravej H, Shivazad M, Adibmoradi M, Yakhchali B. Effect of dietary probiotic, prebiotic and butyric acid glycerides on performance and serum composition in broiler chickens. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2009; 8: 2329-2334. [In Persian]
45- Fan Y, Croom J, Christensen V, Black B, Bird A, Daniel L, et al. Jejunal glucose uptake and oxygen consumption in turkey poults selected for rapid growth. Poultry Science. 1997; 76: 1738–1745.
46- Fajardo P, Pastrana L, Mendes I, Fucifios C, Guerra N.P. Effect of feeding of two potentially probiotic preparations from lactic acid bacteria on the performance and cecal microflora of broiler chickens. The Scientific World Journal. 2012; 1-9.
47- Kabir S.M.L, Rahman M.M, Rahman M.B, Hossain M.Z, Akand M.S.I. Viability of probiotics in balancing intestinal flora and effecting histological changes of crop and cecal tissues of broilers. Biotechnology. 2005; 4: 325330.
48- Jeong J.S, Kim I.H. Effect of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 spores as a probiotic feed supplement on growth performance, noxious gas emission, and intestinal microflora in broilers. Poultry Science. 2014; 93: 3097–3103.
49- Chichlowski M, Croom J, McBride B.D, Havenstein G.B, Koci M.D. Metabolic and physiological impact of probiotics or direct-fed-microbials on poultry (review). International Journal of Poultry Science. 2007; 6: 694-704.
تازه ها در میکروب شناسی دامپزشکی
دوره 6، شماره 2
اسفند 1402
صفحه 44-56

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 16 اردیبهشت 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 21 اردیبهشت 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 25 اردیبهشت 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار